I'm not technical. Can I work with iDev?

Absolutely. Most of our clients are non-technical. Just tell us what you want the end result to look like — we handle all the technical details.

How much does it cost to hire iDev?

We quote individually based on project scope and complexity. Initial consultation is completely free — we give you a clear quote after understanding your needs. No fit, no charge.

How big is the iDev team?

A few core members, each capable of delivering full-stack independently. We flexibly assign people based on project scale and can run multiple projects simultaneously.

What happens after project delivery?

We provide complete code and documentation at handover. For ongoing feature development or maintenance, we offer monthly or per-project arrangements. Most clients choose long-term collaboration.

What if I'm not satisfied with the project midway?

We confirm with you at every stage before moving forward. If the direction is off, we adjust immediately. If it truly can't continue, completed work is settled normally and all code is yours.

我完全不懂技术，能合作吗？

当然可以。我们的大部分客户都不是技术背景。你只需要告诉我们你想要什么效果，技术实现的事情完全由我们来处理。

费用大概是多少？

根据项目复杂度和功能范围单独报价。初次沟通完全免费，我们会在了解需求后给出明确报价，合适再开始，不合适不收费。

团队有几个人？

核心团队几个人，都是能独立交付的全栈开发者。根据项目规模灵活安排人手，可以同时推进多个项目，不用等排期。

项目做完以后怎么维护？

交付时会提供完整的代码和文档。后续如果需要功能迭代或维护，可以按月或按次合作。大部分客户选择了长期合作。

做到一半不满意怎么办？

每个阶段交付前都会和你确认。如果方向不对，我们及时调整。如果实在无法继续，已完成的部分正常结算，代码归你。

Bun vs Deno vs Node.js：2026 年服务端 JavaScript 运行时基准测试

Bun vs Deno vs Node.js: 2026 Server-Side JavaScript Runtime Benchmark

| iDev PR | 2026-08-30T09:21:44

基于真实业务场景对 Bun 1.2、Deno 2.1 和 Node.js 22 进行全面基准测试，从 HTTP 性能、冷启动、内存占用到开发体验一一对比。

A comprehensive benchmark of Bun 1.2, Deno 2.1, and Node.js 22 across real-world business scenarios, comparing HTTP performance, cold start, memory footprint, and developer experience.

运行时之战的最新战况服务端 JavaScript 运行时领域在 2026 年形成了三足鼎立的格局。我们基于 iDev 的真实业务场景，对三大运行时进行了详尽的基准测试。测试环境测试在配备 AMD EPYC 7763 处理器和 64GB 内存的服务器上进行，操作系统为 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS。三个运行时版本分别为 Bun 1.2.3、Deno 2.1.4 和 Node.js 22.8.0。HTTP 吞吐量Bun：每秒处理 182,000 请求，延迟 P99 为 1.2msDeno：每秒处理 143,000 请求，延迟 P99 为 2.1msNode.js：每秒处理 98,000 请求，延迟 P99 为 3.8ms冷启动时间对于一个包含 50 个依赖的典型 Web 应用：Bun：28ms（得益于内置打包器的预编译优化）Deno：85ms（V8 快照机制发挥作用）Node.js：210ms（CommonJS 模块解析开销较大）内存占用处理 10,000 个并发 WebSocket 连接时的 RSS 内存占用：Bun 为 68MB，Deno 为 92MB，Node.js 为 145MB。Bun 的 JavaScriptCore 引擎在内存效率方面优势明显。开发体验评估Node.js 依然拥有最成熟的生态系统和最广泛的社区支持。Deno 的内置工具链（格式化、测试、lint）体验最佳。Bun 的极致性能适合对延迟敏感的场景。建议团队根据项目特点选择：新项目可以优先考虑 Bun 或 Deno，存量项目继续使用 Node.js 仍然是安全的选择。

Latest Status of the Runtime WarsThe server-side JavaScript runtime landscape in 2026 has formed a three-way standoff. We conducted exhaustive benchmarks across all three runtimes based on real-world business scenarios at iDev.Test EnvironmentTests were conducted on a server equipped with an AMD EPYC 7763 processor and 64GB RAM, running Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. Runtime versions were Bun 1.2.3, Deno 2.1.4, and Node.js 22.8.0.HTTP ThroughputBun: 182,000 requests per second, P99 latency of 1.2msDeno: 143,000 requests per second, P99 latency of 2.1msNode.js: 98,000 requests per second, P99 latency of 3.8msCold Start TimeFor a typical web application with 50 dependencies:Bun: 28ms (benefiting from built-in bundler pre-compilation optimization)Deno: 85ms (V8 snapshot mechanism at work)Node.js: 210ms (CommonJS module resolution overhead is significant)Memory FootprintRSS memory usage when handling 10,000 concurrent WebSocket connections: Bun at 68MB, Deno at 92MB, Node.js at 145MB. Bun's JavaScriptCore engine shows clear advantages in memory efficiency.Developer Experience AssessmentNode.js still has the most mature ecosystem and broadest community support. Deno's built-in toolchain (formatting, testing, linting) offers the best experience. Bun's extreme performance suits latency-sensitive scenarios. Teams should choose based on project characteristics: new projects can prioritize Bun or Deno, while continuing with Node.js for existing projects remains a safe choice.

← Back to News