I'm not technical. Can I work with iDev?

Absolutely. Most of our clients are non-technical. Just tell us what you want the end result to look like — we handle all the technical details.

How much does it cost to hire iDev?

We quote individually based on project scope and complexity. Initial consultation is completely free — we give you a clear quote after understanding your needs. No fit, no charge.

How big is the iDev team?

A few core members, each capable of delivering full-stack independently. We flexibly assign people based on project scale and can run multiple projects simultaneously.

What happens after project delivery?

We provide complete code and documentation at handover. For ongoing feature development or maintenance, we offer monthly or per-project arrangements. Most clients choose long-term collaboration.

What if I'm not satisfied with the project midway?

We confirm with you at every stage before moving forward. If the direction is off, we adjust immediately. If it truly can't continue, completed work is settled normally and all code is yours.

我完全不懂技术，能合作吗？

当然可以。我们的大部分客户都不是技术背景。你只需要告诉我们你想要什么效果，技术实现的事情完全由我们来处理。

费用大概是多少？

根据项目复杂度和功能范围单独报价。初次沟通完全免费，我们会在了解需求后给出明确报价，合适再开始，不合适不收费。

团队有几个人？

核心团队几个人，都是能独立交付的全栈开发者。根据项目规模灵活安排人手，可以同时推进多个项目，不用等排期。

项目做完以后怎么维护？

交付时会提供完整的代码和文档。后续如果需要功能迭代或维护，可以按月或按次合作。大部分客户选择了长期合作。

做到一半不满意怎么办？

每个阶段交付前都会和你确认。如果方向不对，我们及时调整。如果实在无法继续，已完成的部分正常结算，代码归你。

Cursor、Claude Code 和 GitHub Copilot：AI 编程工具横评

Cursor vs Claude Code vs GitHub Copilot AI Coding Tools Compared

| iDev Team | 2026-07-31T06:54:00

2026 年 AI 编程工具百花齐放，本文从代码补全、上下文理解、重构能力、价格等维度横向对比 Cursor、Claude Code 和 GitHub Copilot。

AI coding tools are flourishing in 2026. This article compares Cursor, Claude Code, and GitHub Copilot across code completion, context understanding, refactoring, and pricing.

AI 编程工具的现状 2026 年，AI 编程工具已经从“锦上添花”变成了“必备生产力工具”。iDev 团队在日常开发中同时使用了多款工具，以下是我们的实测体验。三款工具概览 GitHub Copilot 微软出品，基于 OpenAI 模型，与 VS Code 深度集成。最老牌的 AI 编程助手。 Cursor 基于 VS Code fork 的独立 IDE，内置多模型支持，以 Chat + Edit 模式著称。 Claude Code Anthropic 出品的 CLI 工具，直接在终端中使用，可以读写文件、执行命令、管理 Git，Agent 模式可以自主完成复杂任务。对比维度维度CopilotCursorClaude Code 代码补全优秀，Tab 补全体验流畅优秀，支持多行预测不提供行内补全上下文理解当前文件 + 最近打开的文件项目级别，可索引整个代码库项目级别，可读取任意文件重构能力基础中等，Chat 模式可指导重构强，Agent 模式可自主完成跨文件重构终端集成有限内置终端原生终端工具，命令执行能力强多文件编辑不支持支持原生支持，且可自主决策修改哪些文件 iDev 的使用策略我们的团队目前采用"组合拳"策略：日常编码：Cursor 的行内补全 + Chat 模式复杂任务：Claude Code 的 Agent 模式处理跨文件修改、架构重构代码审查：Claude Code 的 code review 功能没有一款工具能完美覆盖所有场景，选择适合你工作流的组合才是最佳方案。

The State of AI Coding Tools In 2026, AI coding tools have evolved from "nice-to-have" to "essential productivity tools." The iDev team uses multiple tools in daily development — here's our hands-on experience. Three Tools Overview GitHub Copilot Made by Microsoft, powered by OpenAI models, deeply integrated with VS Code. The most established AI coding assistant. Cursor A standalone IDE forked from VS Code with built-in multi-model support, known for its Chat + Edit modes. Claude Code A CLI tool from Anthropic that works directly in the terminal, capable of reading/writing files, executing commands, managing Git, with an Agent mode that can autonomously complete complex tasks. Comparison DimensionCopilotCursorClaude Code Code CompletionExcellent, smooth tab completionExcellent, multi-line predictionNo inline completion Context UnderstandingCurrent file + recently opened filesProject-level, can index entire codebaseProject-level, can read any file RefactoringBasicModerate, Chat mode can guide refactoringStrong, Agent mode can autonomously handle cross-file refactoring Terminal IntegrationLimitedBuilt-in terminalNative terminal tool with strong command execution Multi-file EditingNot supportedSupportedNatively supported, can autonomously decide which files to modify iDev's Usage Strategy Our team currently uses a "combo" approach: Daily coding: Cursor's inline completion + Chat mode Complex tasks: Claude Code's Agent mode for cross-file modifications and architectural refactoring Code review: Claude Code's code review feature No single tool perfectly covers all scenarios — choosing the right combination for your workflow is the best strategy.

← Back to News